Sunday, November 20, 2011

Capturing the Joys

 
I absolutely enjoyed making this video and I found it much easier than making a clip using found footage online. Using my own original footage, I was able to create scenes in the exact way that I had pictured them in my head. Finding ideal settings, capturing the right angles and being aware of the time of day and lighting for each scene added an element of excitement to the production. Directing the wonderful people in this video and making specific creative decisions made me feel like a film director for a moment.

From the start I wanted to produce a happy video; one that would make people smile and warm hearts. Capturing genuine smiles and laughter, sunlight, the sky, balloons, smiley faces and hearts, all contributed to the creation of a video that attempts to show the joyful moments in life. Avoiding unwanted noise while filming was a struggle. I forgot to pay particular attention to the sounds around. Luckily the video works better with the music playing over the scenes. 

For this project I attempted to make my own sound track in Garage Band using the keyboard attached to the computer. I was quite impressed with the outcome. In less than an hour I had made something that worked well enough with the images and ambiance in the video. Using the higher keys on the piano and utilizing sounds like "falling stars" I was able to create a sound track that created a happy mood. Using Garage Band and Final Cut Pro for the second time definitely made the whole process easier.








Saturday, November 19, 2011

Monday, November 14, 2011

Who knew a minute could be so long?



At the beginning of the project, I thought I would be done with the video within a few hours...I mean, it was only one minute clip. A few hours turned into days. Finding ideal clips for my video was a difficult task. I now see what Duchamp meant by the "act of selection being a form of inspiration as original and significant as any other." In the article, Fair Use by Negitivland, I find it intriguing how many times the words "stealing" and "theft" are referenced.  I think the statement "most artists know that stealing is not only OK, but desirable even crucial to creative evolution," is a very bold statement. I prefer the idea of appropriation or "remixing" as explained by Lawrence Lessig in "Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy."

In two articles, one by Lawrence Lessig and another "Measuring Fair Use: The Four Factors," it is clear that the idea of "fair use" is a very vague concept, which can only be settled in the courts. Without any clear boundaries, I found myself worrying greatly about the possibility of my work going against copyright laws. On one hand it is said that "stealing is required for creative evolution" and on the other hand you can end up in court, spending ridiculous amounts of money on a lawyer for doing this very thing. I am very confused.

 Using Final Cut Pro to edit the found clips was a quite hard, but the most difficult thing for me was learning to use Garageband. I am happy with the final outcome, but from now on I will not be critical of other videos. My video serves as a critique of food waste and draws awareness to the famine in Somalia.




Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Oh, the Irony




For a recent project, I did some research on the artist Harrell Fletcher. After doing quite a lot of research on Harrell, I must confess that I am hesitant to use the word "artist" in relation to him. According to Harrell Fletcher, "art is anything valued or appreciated by someone and everyone has the potential to be an artist." In my opinion this general statement creates a situation in which  there is no need to make a distinction between artist and non-artist. If essentially everything is art and everyone is capable of making art, then there is nothing special or rewarding in being referred to as an artist. Additionally many people who have committed their lives to creating art will in a sense have no title.

I also find it  intriguing that Harrell criticizes what we know as the "art world" yet he functions so well in it. He accuses the art world of discriminating yet does the same by denying the validity of what some may refer to as "traditional" art. It may come across as though I am ranting and please excuse me if it does. There are many things that I do appreciate about Harrell's work. I enjoy how his work points to the overlooked and dismissed details in everyday life. He also does a great job of getting the public involved. His willingness to share the spotlight with others or fall into the background in an interesting way makes him stand out from other artists. Harrell Fletcher once said that he uses art to disappear,  but his approach does quite the opposite.

The internet together with the many elements of irony that arise in Harrell Fletcher's work have contributed greatly in making him into the artist he is today.